Trump Team: Impeachment would cause revolt, economic crash

Because the hush payments were intended to influence the outcome of the elections, they violated US laws governing campaign contributions…

(Article republished from LibertyHeadlines.com)

(AFP) US President Donald Trump and his allies tried to head off mounting talk of his impeachment Thursday, warning it would sink the world’s largest economy and spark a public “revolt.”

After Trump was implicated as a co-conspirator in two campaign finance violations, both of them federal felonies, he and his closest advisors offered dire words of caution about the consequences of removing him from office.

“I will tell you what, if I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash, I think everybody would be very poor,” the president warned in an interview aired Thursday on talk show “Fox and Friends.”

“I don’t know how you can impeach somebody who has done a great job.”

The president’s personal lawyer-cum-spokesman Rudy Giuliani echoed that stark warning, hinting at political unrest.

“You would only impeach him for political reasons and the American people would revolt against that,” he told Sky News while on a golf course in Scotland.

The comments came after two of Trump’s former top aides — onetime campaign chairman Paul Manafort and longtime lawyer Michael Cohen — were found guilty of various financial crimes in a one-two punch for the president.

Cohen pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations in the form of hush payments during the 2016 campaign to two women who alleged they had affairs with Trump, which he said he committed at the behest of the then-candidate.

Although Cohen did not name the women, they were believed to be porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal.

Because the hush payments were intended to influence the outcome of the elections, they violated US laws governing campaign contributions, making Trump an — as yet — unindicted co-conspirator.

In another hammer blow Thursday, The Wall Street Journal and other US media reported that the CEO of tabloid publisher American Media, David Pecker, has been given immunity by prosecutors investigating the payments, opening a new area of vulnerability for Trump.

Pecker’s company publishes the National Enquirer.

A president can be removed from office by Congress for “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Will not be improperly influenced

As the legal net closed in on Trump, he renewed attacks on his own Attorney General Jeff Sessions, in an apparent attempt to have him squash awkward investigations that could endanger the president.

The president has repeatedly berated Sessions for recusing himself from the federal probe into Russian election meddling, which has expanded into questions of collusion and obstruction of justice as well as the financial dealings of Trump associates.

“I put in an attorney general that never took control of the justice department,” he complained to Fox News, fueling rumors he may fire Sessions and install someone more pliant.

That prompted Sessions to fire back that he would not be swayed, in a remarkable public broadside.

“While I am attorney general, the actions of the Department of Justice will not be improperly influenced by political considerations,” he said.

Lawmakers from Trump’s own Republican Party warned the president they would not confirm a new attorney general if Sessions — a former senator — was fired.

“It would be a very, very, very bad idea to fire the attorney general because he’s not executing his job as a political hack,” said Senator Ben Sasse.

Hush payments ‘not a crime’?

Trump’s story about Cohen’s payments has changed multiple times over the past year, and in the Fox interview aired Thursday, he tried several ways of defusing the allegations.

Trump claimed his former lawyer “made the deals,” and insisted that Cohen’s actions were “not a crime,” while going on to claim that “campaign violations are considered not a big deal, frankly.”

Trump then said the hush payments were financed with his own money — to which Cohen had access — and that while he had no knowledge of them at the time, he had since been fully transparent.

In entering a guilty plea, Cohen said under oath that the payments were made “in coordination with and at the direction of a candidate for federal office” — a clear reference to Trump.

Cohen also has pleaded guilty to six counts of fraud.

Cooperating ‘almost ought to be outlawed’

In the sit-down with Fox, Trump slammed his once close associate for “flipping,” saying it “almost ought to be outlawed.”

Trump conversely praised Manafort for going to trial — the first case stemming from Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe to go before a jury — and eschewing a plea deal.

Asked if he was considering a pardon for Manafort, Trump told Fox only that he has “great respect for what he has done, in terms of what he has gone through.”

On Thursday, Trump ignored questions from the press on the issue.

But Giuliani floated the idea that Manafort — who faces more charges more directly related to the Russia probe — should hold out for a pardon.

Recounting pardon discussions with Trump, Giuliani told The Washington Post: “We told him he should wait until all the investigations are over.”

“The real concern is whether Mueller would turn any pardon into an obstruction charge,” Giuliani said.

Read more at: LibertyHeadlines.com